Course Information Assignments Lecture Notes Resources Exam Review & Other Information
   Assignments

Terms

Top 10 Major Events

Levels of Questions

Harvard Outline

Philosophical Chairs

One-Pager

Zinn

Hall of Fame (Word)

Creating a DBQ

Position Paper

Article Review

Book Review

Primary Source

Secondary Source

MLA Citation


   

 

 

   
  Article Review
   
 

Writing an article review as an assignment in this course has the following important four objectives:

  1. effective writing,
  2. a substantive knowledge about a particular topic,
  3. an understanding of the nature and use of historical research,
  4. an ability to think critically about the work of others.

An article review goes beyond mere summary and inquires into the overall worth of the work. There are five steps to prepare an article for review:

  1. Introduction – After reading the assigned article, briefly discuss the purpose of the article. Why did the author write the article? What is the reason for this article? The opening statement takes the readers from where they presumably stand in point of knowledge and brings them to the article under review; e.g., “In the article “A Little Commonwealth” John Demos analyzes the structure and development of Puritan society in seventeenth century Massachusetts.”

  2. Critical Summary – What is the thesis of the article? What are the author’s major contentions? Summarize the contents of the article indicating how the thesis is developed. Use examples. While this will be the longest part of your review, you should make sure that your paper does not become a mere summary without analysis. How does the author use the evidence to support the thesis and secondary points?

  3. Historical Relationship – Discuss the ways in which the article contributes to your understanding of the historical period; e.g. what does the article teach you about colonial America that the textbook and class lectures/discussions do not? Be very specific, noting how the article contributes to your knowledge of the historical period. Why is this an important article for you to read as we study a particular historical period?

  4. Conclusion – Briefly discuss the major strengths and weaknesses of the article. Does it fit into the prevailing interpretation/consensus about the topic? Is this information different from that you previously learned? If so, how? Discuss the overall worth of the article to your understanding of United States History.

  5. Writing the Review
    1. At the top of the page, give the title and author of the work under review.
    2. Type the review. Double-spaced. The typical review is 300 to 1000 words long. Try not to exceed three pages. Reviews may be hand written in ink, on one side of the page.
    3. If you quote from the article, simply follow the quotation with the page number(s) in parenthesis; e.g. “The author makes the incredible assertion that Jefferson turned out to be one of America’s worst presidents.” (123)
   
Go to the Mock Trial site Go to the APUSH site Go to the Youth & Law Site Go to the Soccer site